
Tokenmaxxing Is Not Efficiency: How to Measure AI Productivity
Token counts and lines of code are easy to count and easy to game. Goodhart's law explains why AI productivity metrics fail and what to track instead.
We assess your data, infrastructure, and use cases to find the AI projects worth building and tell you which ones are not ready yet.
Every company is being told they need an AI strategy. Few are being told what that means: evaluating which problems AI can solve profitably, ensuring the data foundation exists to support it, and building the organizational muscle to govern AI systems over time. The starting point is the same whether the board is asking about AI, a previous project stalled, or LLM costs are spiraling: a structured assessment of what is realistic before you invest.
2-6 weeks
Typical readiness assessment turnaround
UC Berkeley
Where our co-founder teaches ML at Scale and MLOps
12
Dimensions audited across CorrDyn's assessment framework
Engagements where this is the right work.
Your leadership wants an AI strategy. You need a way to separate the projects with real ROI from the ones that sound good in a pitch deck. We build that evaluation framework.
You built a proof of concept and it never made it to production. The model worked in a notebook but fell apart on real data, or the team lost confidence and moved on. We diagnose what went wrong, whether the use case is still worth pursuing, and what needs to change before you try again.
Should you fine-tune a model, use an API, or buy a SaaS product? The answer depends on your data, your team, and your tolerance for maintenance. We map the tradeoffs so you choose with data, not hype.
Your team has a dozen AI ideas and no framework for deciding which ones to fund first. We score each use case against data readiness, expected ROI, implementation complexity, and organizational capacity so you invest in the projects most likely to deliver.
You have AI tooling pitches stacking up but no rubric. We score vendors against your data, your team, and your actual use cases, not the demo script.
A structured approach that delivers results at every stage.
We use the CorrDyn Data Operating Model (CDOM) to evaluate your organization across twelve dimensions of data maturity, viewed through an AI & ML Readiness lens. The primary dimensions are AI readiness (do you have prioritized use cases and evaluation frameworks?), data strategy (is data being deliberately collected as fuel for AI, or is it an accidental byproduct?), and governance and quality (AI amplifies bad data). Supporting dimensions include storage and modeling, security and privacy, and internal capability readiness. Each dimension is scored against three maturity levels, and we run both technical and executive versions of the assessment to surface alignment gaps between leadership vision and operational reality.
Assessments typically take 2-6 weeks, though complex organizations with many stakeholders or broad scope can take up to 12 weeks.
Output: AI readiness scorecard with dimension-by-dimension write-up
The assessment produces a scorecard with current and target maturity per dimension, a gap analysis, and a written report with specific findings: which AI use cases have the data foundation to support them today, which ones need infrastructure work first, and which ones are not worth pursuing. We apply A Map of Where AI Creates Value in Your Business to identify which value mechanisms matter most for your business, then our 7 Principles framework for evaluating LLM business cases to prioritize specific use cases within those mechanisms by ROI and feasibility. Each recommendation includes a realistic timeline, resource requirements, and a cost-benefit analysis. For a candid look at where AI claims fall short in practice, listen to our conversation with Ben Locwin on separating AI hype from reality in biotech.
Output: Phased AI roadmap with use-case shortlist and budget bands
Strategy without a path to execution is a slide deck. We hand off directly to our data engineering and machine learning teams, or we work alongside your internal team to execute the highest-priority projects. The architectural side of that handoff follows the staged framework in The Context Layer: What to Build, What to Skip, and Where to Start. For organizations that need ongoing guidance, we provide advisory support through the first implementation cycle and quarterly reassessments through the same CDOM lens to track maturity progression. The assessment is designed to be actionable whether you engage us for the build or not.
Output: Pilot scope, success metrics, and go/no-go gates
We pick the right tool for the problem, not the other way around.
Perspectives from our team on ai strategy & readiness.

Token counts and lines of code are easy to count and easy to game. Goodhart's law explains why AI productivity metrics fail and what to track instead.

MotherDuck Guides are a routing layer for analytics agents, not documentation. What to put in them, what to push down, and how to keep them correct.

A staged framework for deciding which data architecture components AI agents need, when to build them, and why, based on the value you are creating.

Use case lists are not strategy. A mechanism-based framework for identifying where AI creates value, organized by what the AI is doing.
We’ll assess your data, your use cases, and your team — and tell you what’s worth building today.
Book an Intro CallOr, see what else we do.

From predictive models to agentic AI workflows and MCP integrations, CorrDyn builds ML and AI systems that deliver measurable business outcomes.

Build reliable, cost-effective data pipelines on AWS, GCP, and Azure. CorrDyn designs and implements data infrastructure that scales.

Fix the trust problem in your data. CorrDyn implements testing, validation, governance frameworks, and metric definitions your organization can maintain.

Get the technology leadership you need without a full-time hire. CorrDyn provides fractional CIO services, compliance guidance, and data strategy.