Skip to content
Looker logo

Looker

BI & Analytics

Looker pioneered version-controlled metric definitions in BI. For GCP-native teams, it remains the most tightly integrated analytics layer.

We build Looker deployments where every metric is defined once in LookML, governed through pull requests, and consumed consistently across every dashboard.

Looker

Looker's core insight was that metric definitions should be code, not dashboard configuration. LookML pioneered this approach, and for teams on GCP it remains a strong semantic layer. Today, tools like Omni, Lightdash, and Rill achieve similar governance through dbt. Teams running both dbt and LookML can choose where their governed metric definitions live, and we help them settle that question cleanly. We believe in-warehouse transformations as version-controlled code is the right approach — the question is whether that code should live in LookML or dbt.

Get in Touch
10+
Looker deployments managed
1
Source of truth for every metric
5+
Year average client relationship

How We Use Looker

Proven approaches from real client engagements.

01Where Looker Is the Strongest Choice

Looker is the right BI tool for organizations that value governance and consistency over visual flexibility. If your biggest analytics pain is that the same metric shows different numbers in different dashboards, LookML solves that problem architecturally, not through process discipline.

The BigQuery integration is the tightest in the market. Looker generates SQL that takes advantage of BigQuery's architecture, and the two products share Google's investment in a unified analytics stack. For teams on GCP, Looker is the natural BI layer. Combined with dbt for transformation, you get a two-tier governance model: dbt governs how raw data becomes clean tables, and LookML governs how those tables are presented to business users.

Looker offers embedded analytics, but the per-user licensing makes it expensive for customer-facing deployments at scale. For teams where embedded dashboards are a primary use case, Omni offers a more cost-effective embedding model alongside native dbt integration.

02What LookML Asks of Your Team

LookML is Looker's defining strength, and it rewards teams who invest in it. Someone on your team needs to learn and maintain the LookML model. For organizations with data engineers or analytics engineers, this is a natural fit. Organizations that want analysts to build their own dashboards with minimal modeling will want to plan for that LookML ownership up front, and we build it into every engagement.

Looker deployments stay healthy when the internal team can extend the LookML model themselves. The risk we guard against is the opposite: an initial LookML project built by an external consultant who then leaves, with no one internal able to extend the model. New business questions arise, and instead of adding a dimension to LookML, analysts write SQL queries in notebooks, defeating the purpose of the governed model. Every Looker engagement we do includes training and documentation so your team can own the model long-term.

03What Most Teams Underuse

Looker's persistent derived tables (PDTs) let you pre-compute expensive queries and serve them as fast tables within the LookML model. Many Looker deployments have slow dashboards because every view runs a complex query against the full dataset. PDTs can reduce query times from minutes to seconds for frequently accessed views.

The Looker API is another underused capability. It supports programmatic access to dashboards, looks, and data, which enables use cases like automated reporting, data distribution to external systems, and integration with custom applications. Teams that treat Looker only as a dashboard tool miss its potential as a data access layer.

04Looker in the AI Era

Google is integrating Gemini with Looker for natural language querying. Because Looker has a semantic model (LookML), AI-generated queries can reference governed metric definitions rather than raw SQL — a meaningful advantage of the semantic-layer approach. Omni takes a similar semantic-layer-grounded path and has shipped a broad AI feature set, including agentic multi-step analysis, AI filtering, and an MCP server. Looker's AI capabilities are maturing quickly on the same foundation, and both benefit from grounding AI in governed metrics rather than raw SQL.

Related Tools

Technologies we commonly pair with Looker.

Frequently Asked
Questions

When is Looker the right choice over other BI tools?
Looker is the strongest choice for teams already on Google Cloud that want tight BigQuery integration and governed self-service through LookML. For teams running dbt, we help decide where governed metric definitions live so LookML and dbt complement each other rather than duplicate work. Where a dbt-native modeling layer is the better fit, Omni is also worth evaluating.
Can CorrDyn help with our existing Looker instance?
Yes. We audit LookML projects for performance issues, inconsistent metric definitions, and governance gaps. Common improvements include restructuring explores for faster queries, consolidating duplicate dimension definitions, and building training materials so your team can extend the model without our help.
How does LookML compare to just writing SQL?
LookML defines dimensions, measures, and relationships once, then lets analysts explore data without writing SQL. The advantage is consistency: every dashboard and every scheduled report uses the same definitions. The tradeoff is that someone needs to maintain the LookML model. We handle that as part of ongoing engagements.
How long does a Looker implementation take?
A focused LookML project covering one business domain (e.g., marketing analytics or sales pipeline) takes 3-6 weeks. A full Looker deployment with multiple business domains, embedded dashboards, and governance setup takes 2-4 months.

Need help with Looker?

Whether you need a new deployment, an optimization audit, or a migration plan, we will start with what you have and tell you what makes sense.

Book an Intro Call